alemán árabe búlgaro checo chino coreano croata danés eslovaco esloveno español estonio farsi finlandés francés griego hebreo hindù húngaro indonesio inglés islandés italiano japonés letón lituano malgache neerlandés noruego polaco portugués rumano ruso serbio sueco tailandès turco vietnamita
alemán árabe búlgaro checo chino coreano croata danés eslovaco esloveno español estonio farsi finlandés francés griego hebreo hindù húngaro indonesio inglés islandés italiano japonés letón lituano malgache neerlandés noruego polaco portugués rumano ruso serbio sueco tailandès turco vietnamita

definición - Human_evolution

definición de Human_evolution (Wikipedia)

   Publicidad ▼


Human evolution


Human evolution is the evolutionary process that has led to the appearance of the order Primates, the hominids ("great apes"), the genus Homo, and eventually Homo sapiens — the modern Human species. Knowledge of this process is based on evidence from many scientific disciplines, including physical anthropology, primatology, archaeology, linguistics, embryology and genetics.[1]

Primate evolution likely began in the late Cretaceous period. According to genetic studies, divergence of primates from other mammals began 85 million years ago and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.[2][3] The family Hominidae, or Great Apes, diverged from the Hylobatidae family 15 to 20 million years ago, and around 14 million years ago, the Ponginae, or orangutans, diverged from the Hominidae family.[4] Bipedalism is the basic adaption of the Hominin line, and the earliest bipedal Hominini is considered to be either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin, with Ardipithecus, a full bipedal, coming somewhat later. The knuckle walkers, the gorilla and chimpanzee, diverged around the same time, and either Sahelanthropus or Orrorin may be our last shared ancestor with those. The early bipedals eventually evolved into the Australopithecines and later the genus Homo.

The earliest documented members of the genus Homo are Homo habilis and Homo gautengensis, which evolved around 2.3 million years ago. Homo habilis is the first species for which we have positive evidence of use of stone tools. The brains of these early homininas were about the same size as that of a chimpanzee. During the next million years a process of encephalization began, and with the arrival of Homo erectus in the fossil record, cranial capacity had doubled. Homo erectus and Homo ergaster were the first of the hominina to leave Africa, and these species spread through Africa, Asia, and Europe between 1.3 to 1.8 million years ago. It is believed that these species were the first to use fire and complex tools.

According to the Recent African Ancestry theory, modern humans evolved in Africa possibly from Homo heidelbergensis and migrated out of the continent some 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, replacing local populations of Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis.[5][6][7][8][9] Although it is also possible that Homo sapiens evolved as multiregionally as separate but interbreeding populations stemming from the worldwide migration of Homo erectus out of Africa nearly 2.5 million years ago.

Archaic Homo sapiens, the forerunner of anatomically modern humans, evolved between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago, as the Neanderthal population declined. Recent DNA evidence suggests that several haplotypes of Neanderthal origin are present among all non-African populations, and Neanderthals and other hominids, such as Denisova hominin may have contributed up to 6% of their genome to present-day humans.[10][11][12] Anatomically modern humans evolved from archaic Homo sapiens in the Middle Paleolithic, about 200,000 years ago.[13] Behaviorally modern humans developed around 50,000 years ago according to many, although some view modern behavior as beginning with the emergence of anatomically modern humans.[14]


  History of ideas

Anaximander postulated that man was, originally, similar to a different animal, that is, a fish. [15]

The word homo, the name of the biological genus to which humans belong, is Latin for "human". It was chosen originally by Carolus Linnaeus in his classification system. The word "human" is from the Latin humanus, the adjectival form of homo. The Latin "homo" derives from the Indo-European root *dhghem, or "earth".[16]

Linnaeus and other scientists of his time also considered the great apes to be the closest relatives of humans due to morphological and anatomical similarities. The possibility of linking humans with earlier apes by descent only became clear after 1859 with the publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. This argued for the idea of the evolution of new species from earlier ones. Darwin's book did not address the question of human evolution, saying only that "Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history".

  Fossil Hominid Evolution Display at The Museum of Osteology, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA

The first debates about the nature of human evolution arose between Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen. Huxley argued for human evolution from apes by illustrating many of the similarities and differences between humans and apes, and did so particularly in his 1863 book Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. However, many of Darwin's early supporters (such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell) did not agree that the origin of the mental capacities and the moral sensibilities of humans could be explained by natural selection. Darwin applied the theory of evolution and sexual selection to humans when he published The Descent of Man in 1871.[17]

A major problem at that time was the lack of fossil intermediaries. Despite the 1891 discovery by Eugène Dubois of what is now called Homo erectus at Trinil, Java, it was only in the 1920s when such fossils were discovered in Africa, that intermediate species began to accumulate. In 1925 Raymond Dart described Australopithecus africanus. The type specimen was the Taung Child, an Australopithecine infant which was discovered in a cave. The child's remains were a remarkably well-preserved tiny skull and an endocranial cast of the brain. Although the brain was small (410 cm³), its shape was rounded, unlike that of chimpanzees and gorillas, and more like a modern human brain. Also, the specimen showed short canine teeth, and the position of the foramen magnum was evidence of bipedal locomotion. All of these traits convinced Dart that the Taung baby was a bipedal human ancestor, a transitional form between apes and humans.

The classification of humans and their relatives has changed considerably since the 1950s.[18] For instance; gracile Australopithecines were thought to be ancestors of the genus Homo, the group to which modern humans belong.[19] Both Australopithecines and Homo sapiens are part of the tribe Hominini.[20]

Data collected during the 1970s suggests that Australopithecines were a diverse group and that A. africanus may not be a direct ancestor of modern humans.[21] Reclassification of Australopithecines that originally were split into either gracile or robust varieties has put the latter into its own genus, Paranthropus.[21] Taxonomists place humans, Australopithecines and related species in the same family as other great apes, in the Hominidae. Richard Dawkins in his book The Ancestor's Tale proposes that robust Australopithecines: Paranthropus, are the ancestors of gorillas, whereas some of the gracile australopithecus are the ancestors of chimpanzees, the others being human ancestors (see Homininae).[20]

Progress during the 1980s and 1990s in DNA sequencing, specifically mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and then Y-chromosome DNA advanced the understanding of human origins.[22][23][24] Sequencing mtDNA and Y-DNA sampled from a wide range of indigenous populations revealed ancestral information relating to both male and female genetic heritage.[25] Aligned in genetic tree differences were interpreted as supportive of a recent single origin.[26] Analysis have shown a greater diverse of DNA pattern throughout Africa, consistent with the idea that Africa is the ancestral home of mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam.[27] The word homo, the name of the biological genus to which humans belong, is Latin for "human". It was chosen originally by Carolus Linnaeus in his classification system. The word "human" is from the Latin humanus, the adjectival form of homo. The Latin "homo" derives from the Indo-European root *dhghem, or "earth".[16]


  Family tree showing the extant hominoids: humans (genus Homo), chimpanzees and bonobos (genus Pan), gorillas (genus Gorilla), orangutans (genus Pongo), and gibbons (four genera of the family Hylobatidae: Hylobates, Hoolock, Nomascus, and Symphalangus). All except gibbons are hominids.

The evidence for human evolution is found in many fields of natural science. Much of this evidence is in the fossil record, although genetics is now playing an ever-increasing and complementary role. The studies of ontogeny, phylogeny and especially evolutionary developmental biology of both vertebrates and invertebrates offer considerable insight into the evolution of all life, including how humans evolved. The specific study of the origin and life of humans is anthropology, with paleoanthropology of particular interest.[28]

In hominids, the fossil record shows the progressive straightening of the spine, the increase in brain volume, changes in facial features towards being more gracile, and a reduction in the muscles of mastication with a concomitant change in dentition.

The tail becomes incorporated into the pelvis as the sacrum in higher primates. All vertebrates have a tail at one point in their development; in humans, it is present for a period of four weeks, during stages 14 to 22 of human embryogenesis.[29] Humans have a non-functional third eyelid, the plica semilunaris. Humans also have external ear muscles,[30] which animals use to swivel and manipulate their ears (independently of their head) to focus their hearing on particular sounds. Humans still have remnants of such muscles, but they are now feeble and now are capable only of slightly wiggling the ear.[31]

The plantaris muscle also serves as evidence of human evolution. The plantaris muscle is used by animals in gripping and manipulating objects with their feet, for example apes, who can use their feet as well as their hands for gripping. Humans have a corresponding muscle, but it is now so underdeveloped that it is often taken out by doctors when they need tissue for reconstruction in other parts of the body. The muscle is so unimportant to the human body that 9% of humans are now born without it.[32] Other evidence includes Jacobson's organ, which is a part of animal anatomy, and which could figure in the sexual prehistory of humans. This organ, located in the nasal passage, detects pheromones (the chemical that triggers sexual desire, alarm, or information about food trails). This organ allows some animals to track others for sex and to warn of potential dangers. Humans are born with the Jacobson’s organ, but in early development its abilities dwindle to a point that it is useless.[33] In some cases, structures once identified as vestigial simply had an unrecognized function.[34] Wisdom teeth serve as evidence of evolution; human ancestors ate a lot of plants, and they needed to eat them quickly enough that they could eat a sufficient amount in one day to get the necessary nutrition. For this reason they had an extra set of molars to make the larger mouth more productive. This was particularly essential as the body lacked the ability to sufficiently digest cellulose. As evolution made its selections, human dietary patterns changed, the jaw became smaller, and the third molar was not as necessary.[35]

  Before Homo

  Evolution of the great apes

Evolutionary history of the primates can be traced back 65 million years.[36] The oldest known primate-like mammal species,[37] the Plesiadapis, came from North America, but they were widespread in Eurasia and Africa during the tropical conditions of the Paleocene and Eocene.


David Begun[38] concluded that early primates flourished in Eurasia and that a lineage leading to the African apes and humans, including Dryopithecus, migrated south from Europe or Western Asia into Africa. The surviving tropical population of primates, which is seen most completely in the upper Eocene and lowermost Oligocene fossil beds of the Faiyum depression southwest of Cairo, gave rise to all living species—lemurs of Madagascar, lorises of Southeast Asia, galagos or "bush babies" of Africa, and the anthropoids: platyrrhine or New World monkeys, catarrhines or Old World monkeys, the great apes, and humans.

The earliest known catarrhine is Kamoyapithecus from uppermost Oligocene at Eragaleit in the northern Kenya Rift Valley, dated to 24 million years ago.[39] Its ancestry is thought to be species related to Aegyptopithecus, Propliopithecus, and Parapithecus from the Fayum, at around 35 million years ago.[40] In 2010, Saadanius was described as a close relative of the last common ancestor of the crown catarrhines, and tentatively dated to 29–28 million years ago, helping to fill an 11-million-year gap in the fossil record.[41]

  Reconstructed tailless Proconsul skeleton

In the early Miocene, about 22 million years ago, the many kinds of arboreally adapted primitive catarrhines from East Africa suggest a long history of prior diversification. Fossils at 20 million years ago include fragments attributed to Victoriapithecus, the earliest Old World Monkey. Among the genera thought to be in the ape lineage leading up to 13 million years ago are Proconsul, Rangwapithecus, Dendropithecus, Limnopithecus, Nacholapithecus, Equatorius, Nyanzapithecus, Afropithecus, Heliopithecus, and Kenyapithecus, all from East Africa. The presence of other generalized non-cercopithecids of middle Miocene age from sites far distant—Otavipithecus from cave deposits in Namibia, and Pierolapithecus and Dryopithecus from France, Spain and Austria—is evidence of a wide diversity of forms across Africa and the Mediterranean basin during the relatively warm and equable climatic regimes of the early and middle Miocene. The youngest of the Miocene hominoids, Oreopithecus, is from coal beds in Italy that have been dated to 9 million years ago.

Molecular evidence indicates that the lineage of gibbons (family Hylobatidae) diverged from Great Apes some 18-12 million years ago, and that of orangutans (subfamily Ponginae) diverged from the other Great Apes at about 12 million years; there are no fossils that clearly document the ancestry of gibbons, which may have originated in a so-far-unknown South East Asian hominoid population, but fossil proto-orangutans may be represented by Ramapithecus from India and Griphopithecus from Turkey, dated to around 10 million years ago.[42]

  Divergence of the human lineage from other Great Apes

  A reconstruction of a female Australopithecus afarensis

Species close to the last common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans may be represented by Nakalipithecus fossils found in Kenya and Ouranopithecus found in Greece. Molecular evidence suggests that between 8 and 4 million years ago, first the gorillas, and then the chimpanzees (genus Pan) split off from the line leading to the humans; human DNA is approximately 98.4% identical to that of chimpanzees when comparing single nucleotide polymorphisms (see human evolutionary genetics). The fossil record of gorillas and chimpanzees is limited. Both poor preservation (rain forest soils tend to be acidic and dissolve bone) and sampling bias probably contribute to this problem.

Other hominines likely adapted to the drier environments outside the equatorial belt, along with antelopes, hyenas, dogs, pigs, elephants, and horses. The equatorial belt contracted after about 8 million years ago. Fossils of these hominans - the species in the human lineage following divergence from the chimpanzees - are relatively well known.

The earliest are Sahelanthropus tchadensis (7 Ma) and Orrorin tugenensis (6 Ma), followed by:

  The hominoids are descendants of a common ancestor.

  Genus Homo

  A reconstruction of Homo habilis
1. Gorilla 2. Australopithecus 3. Homo erectus 4. Neanderthal (La Chapelle aux Saints) 5. Steinheim Skull 6. Euhominid. Notice the decreasing prognathism and thickness of the browridge, and the increasing size of the forehead.

Homo sapiens is the only extant species of its genus, Homo. While some other, extinct Homo species might have been ancestors of Homo sapiens, many were likely our "cousins", having speciated away from our ancestral line.[43][44] There is not yet a consensus as to which of these groups should count as separate species and which as subspecies. In some cases this is due to the dearth of fossils, in other cases it is due to the slight differences used to classify species in the Homo genus.[44] The Sahara pump theory (describing an occasionally passable "wet" Sahara Desert) provides one possible explanation of the early variation in the genus Homo.

Based on archaeological and paleontological evidence, it has been possible to infer, to some extent, the ancient dietary practices of various Homo species and to study the role of diet in physical and behavioral evolution within Homo.[35][45][46][47][48]

  H. habilis and H. gautengensis

Homo habilis lived from about 2.4 to 1.4 Ma. Homo habilis evolved in South and East Africa in the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene, 2.5–2 Ma, when it diverged from the Australopithecines. Homo habilis had smaller molars and larger brains than the Australopithecines, and made tools from stone and perhaps animal bones. One of the first known hominids, it was nicknamed 'handy man' by discoverer Louis Leakey due to its association with stone tools. Some scientists have proposed moving this species out of Homo and into Australopithecus due to the morphology of its skeleton being more adapted to living on trees rather than to moving on two legs like Homo sapiens.[49]

It was considered to be the first species of the genus Homo until May 2010, when a new species, Homo gautengensis was discovered in South Africa, that most likely arose earlier than Homo habilis.[50]

  H. rudolfensis and H. georgicus

These are proposed species names for fossils from about 1.9–1.6 Ma, whose relation to Homo habilis is not yet clear.

  • Homo rudolfensis refers to a single, incomplete skull from Kenya. Scientists have suggested that this was another Homo habilis, but this has not been confirmed.[51]
  • Homo georgicus, from Georgia, may be an intermediate form between Homo habilis and Homo erectus,[52] or a sub-species of Homo erectus.[53]

  H. ergaster and H. erectus

The first fossils of Homo erectus were discovered by Dutch physician Eugene Dubois in 1891 on the Indonesian island of Java. He originally named the material Pithecanthropus erectus based on its morphology, which he considered to be intermediate between that of humans and apes.[54] Homo erectus (H erectus) lived from about 1.8 Ma to about 70,000 years ago (which would indicate that they were probably wiped out by the Toba catastrophe; however, Homo erectus soloensis and Homo floresiensis survived it). Often the early phase, from 1.8 to 1.25 Ma, is considered to be a separate species, Homo ergaster, or it is seen as a subspecies of Homo erectus, Homo erectus ergaster.

In the early Pleistocene, 1.5–1 Ma, in Africa some populations of Homo habilis are thought to have evolved larger brains and made more elaborate stone tools; these differences and others are sufficient for anthropologists to classify them as a new species, Homo erectus. [55] This was made possible by the evolution of locking knees and a different location of the foramen magnum (the hole in the skull where the spine enters). They may have used fire to cook their meat.

A famous example of Homo erectus is Peking Man; others were found in Asia (notably in Indonesia), Africa, and Europe. Many paleoanthropologists now use the term Homo ergaster for the non-Asian forms of this group, and reserve Homo erectus only for those fossils that are found in Asia and meet certain skeletal and dental requirements which differ slightly from H. ergaster.

  H. cepranensis and H. antecessor

These are proposed as species that may be intermediate between H. erectus and H. heidelbergensis.

  • H. antecessor is known from fossils from Spain and England that are dated 1.2 Ma–500 ka.[56][57]
  • H. cepranensis refers to a single skull cap from Italy, estimated to be about 800,000 years old.[58]

  H. heidelbergensis

  Reconstruction of Homo heidelbergensis which may be the direct ancestor of both Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens.

H. heidelbergensis (Heidelberg Man) lived from about 800,000 to about 300,000 years ago. Also proposed as Homo sapiens heidelbergensis or Homo sapiens paleohungaricus.[59]

  H. rhodesiensis, and the Gawis cranium

  • H. rhodesiensis, estimated to be 300,000–125,000 years old. Most current researchers place Rhodesian Man within the group of Homo heidelbergensis, though other designations such as Archaic Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens rhodesiensis have been proposed.
  • In February 2006 a fossil, the Gawis cranium, was found which might possibly be a species intermediate between H. erectus and H. sapiens or one of many evolutionary dead ends. The skull from Gawis, Ethiopia, is believed to be 500,000–250,000 years old. Only summary details are known, and the finders have not yet released a peer-reviewed study. Gawis man's facial features suggest its being either an intermediate species or an example of a "Bodo man" female.[60]

  Neanderthal and Denisova hominin

  Dermoplastic reconstruction of a Neanderthal

H. neanderthalensis, alternatively designated as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis,[61] lived in Europe and Asia from 400,000[62] to about 30,000 years ago. Evidence from sequencing mitochondrial DNA indicated that no significant gene flow occurred between H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens, and, therefore, the two were separate species that shared a common ancestor about 660,000 years ago.[63][64][65] However, the 2010 sequencing of the Neanderthal genome indicated that Neanderthals did indeed interbreed with anatomically modern humans circa 45,000 to 80,000 years ago (at the approximate time that modern humans migrated out from Africa, but before they dispersed into Europe, Asia and elsewhere).[66] Nearly all modern non-African humans have 1% to 4% of their DNA derived from Neanderthal DNA,[66] and this finding is consistent with recent studies indicating that the divergence of some human alleles dates to one Ma, although the interpretation of these studies has been questioned.[67][68] Competition from Homo sapiens probably contributed to Neanderthal extinction.[69][70] They could have co-existed in Europe for as long as 10,000 years.[71]

In 2008, archaeologists working at the site of Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains of Siberia uncovered a small bone fragment from the fifth finger of a juvenile member of a population now referred to as Denisova hominins, or simply Denisovans.[72] Artifacts, including a bracelet, excavated in the cave at the same level were carbon dated to around 40,000 BP. As DNA had survived in the fossil fragment due to the cool climate of the Denisova Cave, both mtDNA and nuclear genomic DNA were sequenced.[10][73]

While the divergence point of the mtDNA was unexpectedly deep in time,[74] the full genomic sequence suggested the Denisovans belonged to the same lineage as Neanderthals, with the two diverging shortly after their line split from that giving rise to modern humans.[10] Modern humans are known to have overlapped with Neanderthals in Europe for more than 10,000 years, and the discovery raises the possibility that Neanderthals, modern humans and the Denisova hominin may have co-existed. Pääbo noted that the existence of this distant branch creates a much more complex picture of humankind during the Late Pleistocene.[72] Evidence has also been found for as much as 6% of the genomes of some modern Melanesians to derive from Denisovans, indicating limited interbreeding in Southeast Asia.[75]

Alleles thought to have originated in Neanderthal and the Denisova hominin have been identified at several genetic loci in the genomes of modern humans outside of Africa. HLA types from Denisovans and Neanderthal represent more than half the HLA alleles of modern Eurasians,[12] indicating strong positive selection for these introgressed alleles.

  H. floresiensis

  Reconstruction of the head of a female Homo floresiensis

H. floresiensis, which lived from approximately 100,000 to 12,000 before present, has been nicknamed hobbit for its small size, possibly a result of insular dwarfism.[76] H. floresiensis is intriguing both for its size and its age, being an example of a recent species of the genus Homo that exhibits derived traits not shared with modern humans. In other words, H. floresiensis shares a common ancestor with modern humans, but split from the modern human lineage and followed a distinct evolutionary path. The main find was a skeleton believed to be a woman of about 30 years of age. Found in 2003 it has been dated to approximately 18,000 years old. The living woman was estimated to be one meter in height, with a brain volume of just 380 cm3 (considered small for a chimpanzee and less than a third of the H. sapiens average of 1400 cm3).[citation needed]

However, there is an ongoing debate over whether H. floresiensis is indeed a separate species.[77] Some scientists hold that H. floresiensis was a modern H. sapiens with pathological dwarfism.[78] This hypothesis is supported in part, because some modern humans who live on Flores, the island where the skeleton was found, are pygmies. This, coupled with pathological dwarfism, could possibly create a hobbit-like human. The other major attack on H. floresiensis is that it was found with tools only associated with H. sapiens.[78]

The hypothesis of pathological dwarfism, however, fails to explain additional anatomical features that are unlike those of modern humans (diseased or not) but much like those of ancient members of our genus. Aside from cranial features, these features include the form of bones in the wrist, forearm, shoulder, knees, and feet.

  H. sapiens

H. sapiens (the adjective sapiens is Latin for "wise" or "intelligent") have lived from about 250,000 years ago to the present. Between 400,000 years ago and the second interglacial period in the Middle Pleistocene, around 250,000 years ago, the trend in skull expansion and the elaboration of stone tool technologies developed, providing evidence for a transition from H. erectus to H. sapiens. The direct evidence suggests there was a migration of H. erectus out of Africa, then a further speciation of H. sapiens from H. erectus in Africa. A subsequent migration within and out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier dispersed H. erectus. This migration and origin theory is usually referred to as the recent single origin or Out of Africa theory. Current evidence does not preclude some multiregional evolution or some admixture of the migrant H. sapiens with existing Homo populations. This is a hotly debated area of paleoanthropology.

Current research has established that humans are genetically highly homogenous; that is, the DNA of individuals is more alike than usual for most species, which may have resulted from their relatively recent evolution or the possibility of a population bottleneck resulting from cataclysmic natural events such as the Toba catastrophe.[79][80][81] Distinctive genetic characteristics have arisen, however, primarily as the result of small groups of people moving into new environmental circumstances. These adapted traits are a very small component of the Homo sapiens genome, but include various characteristics such as skin color and nose form, in addition to internal characteristics such as the ability to breathe more efficiently at high altitudes.

H. sapiens idaltu, from Ethiopia, is an extinct sub-species from about 160,000 years ago.

Comparative table of Homo species
Species Lived when (Ma) Lived where Adult height Adult mass Cranial capacity (cm³) Fossil record Discovery / publication of name
Denisova hominin 0.04 Altai Krai 1 site 2010
H. antecessor 1.2 – 0.8 Spain 1.75 m (5.7 ft) 90 kg (200 lb) 1,000 2 sites 1997
H. cepranensis 0.5 – 0.35 Italy 1,000 1 skull cap 1994/2003
H. erectus 1.8 – 0.2 Africa, Eurasia (Java, China, India, Caucasus) 1.8 m (5.9 ft) 60 kg (130 lb) 850 (early) – 1,100 (late) Many 1891/1892
H. ergaster 1.9 – 1.4 Eastern and Southern Africa 1.9 m (6.2 ft) 700–850 Many 1975
H. floresiensis 0.10 – 0.012 Indonesia 1.0 m (3.3 ft) 25 kg (55 lb) 400 7 individuals 2003/2004
H. gautengensis >2 – 0.6 South Africa 1.0 m (3.3 ft) 1 individual 2010/2010
H. habilis 2.3 – 1.4 Africa 1.0–1.5 m (3.3–4.9 ft) 33–55 kg (73–120 lb) 510–660 Many 1960/1964
H. heidelbergensis 0.6 – 0.35 Europe, Africa, China 1.8 m (5.9 ft) 90 kg (200 lb) 1,100–1,400 Many 1908
H. neanderthalensis 0.35 – 0.03 Europe, Western Asia 1.6 m (5.2 ft) 55–70 kg (120–150 lb) (heavily built) 1,200–1,900 Many (1829)/1864
H. rhodesiensis 0.3 – 0.12 Zambia 1,300 Very few 1921
H. rudolfensis 1.9 Kenya 1 skull 1972/1986
H. sapiens idaltu 0.16 – 0.15 Ethiopia 1,450 3 craniums 1997/2003
H. sapiens sapiens (modern humans) 0.2 – present Worldwide 1.4–1.9 m (4.6–6.2 ft) 50–100 kg (110–220 lb) 1,000–1,850 Still living —/1758
Hominin species distributed through time edit

Homo Australopithecus Ardipithecus Paranthropus Homo sapiens Homo neandertalensis Homo heidelbergensis Homo erectus Paranthropus robustus Paranthropus boisei Paranthropus aethiopicus Homo ergaster Homo habilis Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus bahrelghazali Australopithecus afarensis Australopithecus anamensis Orrorin tugenensis Sahelanthropus Pleistocene Pliocene Miocene

  Use of tools

  "A sharp rock", an Oldowan pebble tool, the most basic of human stone tools
  Fire, one of the greatest human discoveries and important in human evolution
  Acheulean hand-axes from Kent. Homo erectus flint work. The types shown are (clockwise from top) cordate, ficron and ovate.
  Venus of Willendorf, an example of Paleolithic art

The use of tools has been interpreted as a sign of intelligence, and it has been theorized that tool use may have stimulated certain aspects of human evolution, especially the continued expansion of the human brain. Paleontology has yet to explain the expansion of this organ over millions of years despite being extremely demanding in terms of energy consumption. The brain of a modern human consumes about 20 watts (400 kilocalories per day), a fifth of body's total energy consumption.[citation needed] Increased tool use would allow hunting for energy-rich meat products, and would enable processing more energy-rich plant products. Researchers have suggested that early hominids were thus under evolutionary pressure to increase their capacity to create and use tools.[82]

Precisely when early humans started to use tools is difficult to determine, because the more primitive these tools are (for example, sharp-edged stones) the more difficult it is to decide whether they are natural objects or human artifacts. There is some evidence that the australopithecines (4 Ma) may have used broken bones as tools, but this is debated.[83]

It should be noted that many species make and use tools, but it is the human species that dominates the areas of making and using more complex tools. The oldest known tools are the "Oldowan stone tools" from Ethiopia, 2.5-2.6 million years old, which predates the earliest known "Homo" species. There is no known evidence that any "Homo" specimens appeared by 2.5 Ma. A Homo fossil was found near some Oldowan tools, and its age was noted at 2.3 million years old, suggesting that maybe the Homo species did indeed create and use these tools. It is a possibility but does not yet represent solid evidence. Bernard Wood noted that "Paranthropus" co-existed with the early Homo species in the area of the "Oldowan Industrial Complex" over roughly the same span of time. Although there is no direct evidence which identifies Paranthropus as the tool makers, their anatomy lends to indirect evidence of their capabilities in this area. Most paleoanthropologists agree that the early "Homo" species were indeed responsible for most of the Oldowan tools found. They argue that when most of the Oldowan tools were found in association with human fossils, Homo was always present, but Paranthropus was not.[84]

In 1994 Randall Susman used the anatomy of opposable thumbs as the basis for his argument that both the Homo and Paranthropus species were toolmakers. He compared bones and muscles of human and chimpanzee thumbs, finding that humans have 3 muscles which are lacking in chimpanzees. Humans also have thicker metacarpals with broader heads, allowing more precise grasping than the chimpanzee hand can perform. Susman posited that modern anatomy of the human thumb is an evolutionary response to the requirements associated with making and handling tools and that both species were indeed toolmakers.[84]

  Stone tools

Stone tools are first attested around 2.6 Ma, when H. habilis in Eastern Africa used so-called pebble tools, choppers made out of round pebbles that had been split by simple strikes.[85] This marks the beginning of the Paleolithic, or Old Stone Age; its end is taken to be the end of the last Ice Age, around 10,000 years ago. The Paleolithic is subdivided into the Lower Paleolithic (Early Stone Age, ending around 350,000–300,000 years ago), the Middle Paleolithic (Middle Stone Age, until 50,000–30,000 years ago), and the Upper Paleolithic.

The period from 700,000–300,000 years ago is also known as the Acheulean, when H. ergaster (or erectus) made large stone hand axes out of flint and quartzite, at first quite rough (Early Acheulian), later "retouched" by additional, more subtle strikes at the sides of the flakes. After 350,000 BP (Before Present) the more refined so-called Levallois technique was developed, a series of consecutive strikes, by which scrapers, slicers ("racloirs"), needles, and flattened needles were made.[85] Finally, after about 50,000 BP, ever more refined and specialized flint tools were made by the Neanderthals and the immigrant Cro-Magnons (knives, blades, skimmers). In this period they also started to make tools out of bone.

  Modern humans and the "Great Leap Forward" debate

Until about 50,000–40,000 years ago the use of stone tools seems to have progressed stepwise. Each phase (H. habilis, H. ergaster, H. neanderthalensis) started at a higher level than the previous one, but after each phase started, further development was slow. These Homo species were culturally conservative, but after 50,000 BP modern human culture started to evolve more rapidly. Jared Diamond, author of The Third Chimpanzee, and other anthropologists characterize this as a "Great Leap Forward".

Modern humans started burying their dead, using animal hides to make clothing, hunting with more sophisticated techniques (such as using trapping pits or driving animals off cliffs), and engaging in cave painting.[86] As human culture advanced, different populations of humans introduced novelty to existing technologies: artifacts such as fish hooks, buttons and bone needles show signs of variation among different populations of humans, something that had not been seen in human cultures prior to 50,000 BP. Typically, H. neanderthalensis populations do not vary in their technologies.

Among concrete examples of Modern human behavior, anthropologists include specialization of tools, use of jewellery and images (such as cave drawings), organization of living space, rituals (for example, burials with grave gifts), specialized hunting techniques, exploration of less hospitable geographical areas, and barter trade networks. Debate continues as to whether a "revolution" led to modern humans ("the big bang of human consciousness"), or whether the evolution was more gradual.[87]

  Models of human origins

Today, all humans belong to one population of Homo sapiens sapiens, undivided by species barrier. However, according to the "Out-of-Africa" model this is not the first species of hominids: the first species of genus Homo, Homo habilis, evolved in East Africa at least 2 Ma, and members of this species populated different parts of Africa in a relatively short time. Homo erectus evolved more than 1.8 Ma, and by 1.5 Ma had spread throughout the Old World.

Anthropologists have been divided as to whether current human population evolved only in East Africa, speciated, then migrated out of Africa and replaced human populations in Eurasia (called the "Out-of-Africa" Model or the "Complete-Replacement" Model) or evolved as one interconnected population (as postulated by the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis).

  Out of Africa

  Divergence of mitochondrial DNA, passed on only through mothers.[88]

According to the Out-of-Africa model, developed by Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews, modern H. sapiens evolved in Africa 200,000 years ago. Homo sapiens began migrating from Africa between 70,000 – 50,000 years ago and eventually replaced existing hominid species in Europe and Asia.[89][90] Out of Africa has gained support from research using female mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the male Y chromosome. After analysing genealogy trees constructed using 133 types of mtDNA, researchers concluded that all were descended from a female African progenitor, dubbed Mitochondrial Eve. Out of Africa is also supported by the fact that mitochondrial genetic diversity is highest among African populations.[91]

There are differing theories on whether there was a single exodus or several. A multiple dispersal model involves the Southern Dispersal theory,[92] which has gained support in recent years from genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence. In this theory, there was a coastal dispersal of modern humans from the Horn of Africa around 70,000 years ago. This group helped to populate Southeast Asia and Oceania, explaining the discovery of early human sites in these areas much earlier than those in the Levant. A second wave of humans dispersed across the Sinai peninsula into Asia, resulting in the bulk of human population for Eurasia. This second group possessed a more sophisticated tool technology and was less dependent on coastal food sources than the original group. Much of the evidence for the first group's expansion would have been destroyed by the rising sea levels at the end of each glacial maximum.[92] The multiple dispersal model is contradicted by studies indicating that the populations of Eurasia and the populations of Southeast Asia and Oceania are all descended from the same mitochondrial DNA lineages, which support a single migration out of Africa that gave rise to all non-African populations.[93]

A broad study of African genetic diversity, headed by Sarah Tishkoff, found the San people had the greatest genetic diversity among the 113 distinct populations sampled, making them one of 14 "ancestral population clusters". The research also located the origin of modern human migration in south-western Africa, near the coastal border of Namibia and Angola.[94]

According to the Toba catastrophe theory to which some anthropologists and archeologists subscribe, the supereruption of Lake Toba on Sumatra island in Indonesia roughly 70,000 years ago had global consequences,[95] killing most humans then alive and creating a population bottleneck that affected the genetic inheritance of all humans today.[96]

  Multiregional model

  One current view of the temporal and geographical distribution of hominid populations[97] Other interpretations differ mainly in the taxonomy and geographical distribution of hominid species.

Multiregional evolution, a model to account for the pattern of human evolution, was proposed in 1988 by Milford H. Wolpoff.[98][99] Multiregional evolution holds that human evolution from the beginning of the Pleistocene 2.5 million years BP to the present day has been within a single, continuous human species, evolving worldwide from Homo erectus into modern Homo sapiens. According to the multiregional hypothesis, fossil and genomic data are evidence for worldwide human evolution, and they contradict the recent speciation postulated by the Recent African origin hypothesis. The fossil evidence was insufficient for Richard Leakey to resolve this debate.[100] Studies of haplogroups in Y-chromosomal DNA and mitochondrial DNA have largely supported a recent African origin.[101] Evidence from autosomal DNA also predominantly supports a Recent African origin. However evidence for archaic admixture in modern humans had been suggested by some studies.[102] Recent sequencing of Neanderthal[103] and Denisovan[104] genomes shows that some admixture occurred. Modern humans outside Africa have 2-4% Neanderthal alleles in their genome, and some Melanesians have an additional 4-6% of Denisovan alleles. These new results do not contradict the Out of Africa model, except in its strictest interpretation. After recovery from a genetic bottleneck that might be due to the Toba supervolcano catastrophe, a fairly small group left Africa and briefly interbred with Neanderthals, probably in the middle-east or even North Africa before their departure. Their still predominantly-African descendants spread to populate the world. A fraction in turn interbred with Denisovans, probably in south-east Asia, before populating Melanesia.[105] HLA haplotypes of Neanderthal and Denisova origin have been identified in modern Eurasian and Oceanian populations.[12]

  Recent and current human evolution

Natural selection occurs in modern human populations. For example, the population which is at risk of the severe debilitating disease kuru has significant over-representation of an immune variant of the prion protein gene G127V versus non-immune alleles. The frequency of this genetic variant is due to the survival of immune persons.[106][107] Other reported evolutionary trends in other populations include a lengthening of the reproductive period, reduction in cholesterol levels, blood glucose and blood pressure.[108]

It has been argued that human evolution has accelerated since, and as a result of, the development of agriculture and civilization some 10,000 years ago. It is claimed that this has resulted in substantial genetic differences between different current human populations.[109]


Human evolutionary genetics studies how one human genome differs from the other, the evolutionary past that gave rise to it, and its current effects. Differences between genomes have anthropological, medical and forensic implications and applications. Genetic data can provide important insight into human evolution.

  Notable human evolution researchers

  Louis Leakey examining skulls from Olduvai Gorge
  • Robert Broom, Scottish physician and palaeontologist whose work on South Africa led to the discovery and description of the Paranthropus genus of hominins, and of "Mrs. Ples"
  • Raymond Dart, Australian anatomist and palaeoanthropologist, whose work at Taung, in South Africa, led to the discovery of Australopithecus africanus
  • Charles Darwin, British naturalist who documented considerable evidence that species originate through evolutionary change
  • Donald Johanson, United States paleoanthropologist, credited with discovering Australopithecus afarensis
  • Louis Leakey, Kenyan archaeologist and naturalist, who helped establish human evolutionary development in Africa
  • Mary Leakey, British archaeologist and anthropologist whose discoveries in Africa include the Laetoli footprints
  • Richard Leakey, Kenyan paleontologist and archaeologist, son of Louis and Mary Leakey
  • Svante Pääbo, Swedish biologist specializing in evolutionary genetics
  • Chris Stringer, anthropologist, leading proponent of the recent single origin hypothesis
  • Alan Templeton, United States geneticist and statistician, proponent of the multiregional hypothesis
  • Erik Trinkaus, United States paleoanthropologist and expert on Neanderthal, proponent of Human/Neanderthal admixture hypothesis
  • Milford H. Wolpoff, United States paleoanthropologist, leading proponent of the multiregional evolution hypothesis

  Species list

This list is in chronological order across the page by genus.

  See also


  1. ^ Heng HH (May 2009). "The genome-centric concept: resynthesis of evolutionary theory". BioEssays 31 (5): 512–25. DOI:10.1002/bies.200800182. PMID 19334004. 
  2. ^ "Nova – Meet Your Ancestors". PBS. Retrieved 2008-10-24.
  3. ^ "Plesiadapis" (PDF). North Dakota Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-10-24.
  4. ^ Dawkins R (2004) The Ancestor's Tale. ^ "Query: Hominidae/Hylobatidae". Time Tree. 2009. Retrieved December 2010.
  5. ^ Stringer, C.B. (1994). "Evolution of Early Humans". In Steve Jones, Robert Martin & David Pilbeam. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 242. ISBN 978-0-521-32370-3.  Also ISBN 978-0-521-46786-5 (paperback)
  6. ^ McHenry, H.M (2009). "Human Evolution". In Michael Ruse & Joseph Travis. Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 265. ISBN 978-0-674-03175-3. 
  7. ^ "Out of Africa Revisited - 308 (5724): 921g - Science". Sciencemag.org. 2005-05-13. DOI:10.1126/science.308.5724.921g. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;308/5724/921g. Retrieved 2009-11-23. 
  8. ^ Nature (2003-06-12). "Access: Human evolution: Out of Ethiopia". Nature. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v423/n6941/full/423692a.html. Retrieved 2009-11-23. 
  9. ^ "Origins of Modern Humans: Multiregional or Out of Africa?". ActionBioscience. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/johanson.html. Retrieved 2009-11-23. 
  10. ^ a b c Reich D, Green RE, Kircher M, et al. (December 2010). "Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia". Nature 468 (7327): 1053–60. DOI:10.1038/nature09710. PMID 21179161. 
  11. ^ Noonan J. P (May 2010). "Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans". Genome Res. 20 (5): 547–53. DOI:10.1101/gr.076000.108. PMC 2860157. PMID 20439435. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2860157. 
  12. ^ a b c Laurent Abi-Rached, et al. (2011-08-25). "The Shaping of Modern Human Immune Systems by Multiregional Admixture with Archaic Humans". Science 334 (6052). DOI:10.1126/science.1209202. PMID 21868630. Archived from the original on Aug2011. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=publichealthresources. 
  13. ^ Fossil Reanalysis Pushes Back Origin of Homo sapiens, February 17, 2005, Scientific American.
  14. ^ Mellars, Paul (2006). "Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago?". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (25): 9381–6. Bibcode 2006PNAS..103.9381M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510792103. PMC 1480416. PMID 16772383.
  15. ^ According to Hippolytus, Book I.
  16. ^ a b American Heritage Dictionary; Houghton Mifflin Company (October 2006). More word histories and mysteries: from aardvark to zombie. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. pp. 99–. ISBN 978-0-618-71681-4. http://books.google.com/books?id=UbXao0TjfKgC&pg=PA99. Retrieved 10 November 2011. 
  17. ^ Darwin, Charles (1871. This edition published 1981, with Introduction by John Tyler Bonner & Robert M. May). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-02369-7. 
  18. ^ Walter Carl Hartwig (2002). The primate fossil record. Cambridge University Press. p. 409. ISBN 978-0-521-66315-1. http://books.google.com/books?id=Ezm1OA_s6isC&pg=PA409. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  19. ^ Frederick Grine (31 December 2007). Evolutionary History of the "Robust" Australopithecines. Transaction Publishers. p. 301. ISBN 978-0-202-36137-6. http://books.google.com/books?id=AmQ46CDN6DsC&pg=PA301. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  20. ^ a b Richard Dawkins; Yan Wong (September 2005). The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-618-61916-0. http://books.google.com/books?id=rR9XPnaqvCMC&pg=PA86. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  21. ^ a b Philip Briggs (1 October 2009). Tanzania: With Zanzibar, Pemba & Mafia. Bradt Travel Guides. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-84162-288-0. http://books.google.com/books?id=uvAFRd1CtHMC&pg=PA6. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  22. ^ Amade M'charek (2005). The Human Genome Diversity Project: an ethnography of scientific practice. Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-83222-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=n-K436zeUY8C&pg=PA96. Retrieved 10 November 2011. 
  23. ^ Rob DeSalle; Ian Tattersall (2008). Human origins: what bones and genomes tell us about ourselves. Texas A&M University Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-1-58544-567-7. http://books.google.com/books?id=Bf4Sitw7YaIC&pg=PA146. Retrieved 10 November 2011. 
  24. ^ R. J. Trent (2005). Molecular medicine: an introductory text. Academic Press. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-0-12-699057-7. http://books.google.com/books?id=772BEp8ZyMYC&pg=PA6. Retrieved 9 November 2011. 
  25. ^ Donovan Webster; Spencer Wells (20 April 2010). Meeting the Family: One Man's Journey Through His Human Ancestry. National Geographic Books. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-4262-0573-6. http://books.google.com/books?id=cdiy1EhJVW0C&pg=PA53. Retrieved 10 November 2011. 
  26. ^ Michael R. Speicher; Stylianos E. Antonarakis; Arno G. Motulsky (3 February 2010). Vogel and Motulsky's Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches. Springer. p. 606. ISBN 978-3-540-37653-8. http://books.google.com/books?id=FlfPSpBvKLgC&pg=PA606. Retrieved 10 November 2011. 
  27. ^ Dr Kutty (14 September 2009). Adam's Gene and the Mitochondrial Eve. Xlibris Corporation. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-4415-0729-7. http://books.google.com/books?id=sUqYgipyiGMC&pg=PA40. Retrieved 9 November 2011. 
  28. ^ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
  29. ^ Saraga-Babić, M; Lehtonen, E; Svajger, A; Wartiovaara, J (1994). "Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of axial structures in the transitory human tail". Annals of anatomy 176 (3): 277–86. PMID 8059973. 
  30. ^ Owen, R. 1866–1868. Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of Vertebrates. London
  31. ^ Montagna, W; Machida, H; Perkins, E.M. (1966). "The skin of primates XXXIII.: The skin of the angwantibo". American Journal of Physical Anthropology 25 (3): 277–290. DOI:10.1002/ajpa.1330250307. PMID 5971502. 
  32. ^ Wiedersheim, Robert (1893). The Structure of Man: an index to his past history. London: Macmillan and Co.
  33. ^ Muller, G. B. (2002) "Vestigial Organs and Structures." in Encyclopedia of Evolution. Mark Pagel, editor in chief, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1131–1133
  34. ^ "Vestigial Organs Not So Useless After All, Studies Find"
  35. ^ a b Walker, Alan (2006). "Early Hominin Diets: Overview and Historical Perspectives". In Peter Ungar. Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable. US: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–10. ISBN 978-0-19-518346-7. http://books.google.com/?id=6mxZ1hNBHgkC&pg=PA357&lpg=PA357&dq=%22The+Calcaneus+of+Australopithecus+afarensis+and+its+implications+for+the+Evolution+of+Bipedality%22&q=%22The%20Calcaneus%20of%20Australopithecus%20afarensis%20and%20its%20implications%20for%20the%20Evolution%20of%20Bipedality%22.  (scroll up to view chapter 1 & part of chapter 2, which is a serendipitous result from another search. Subsequent attempts get a targeted search result gave returns without chapter 1).
  36. ^ [1] page 9 [2][3] 1999] - [P.R. Willoughby - 2005 [4][5] International Journal of Comparative Psychology UCLA ] - [R.D. Martin - 2002 doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03083-7 ] - [S. Tavaré, C. R. Marshall, O. Will, C. Soligo, & R. D. Martin - 2001 doi:10.1038/416726a ] [Retrieved 2012-01-01]
  37. ^ [K. D. Rose -1994 DOI: 10.1002/evan.1360030505 ] - [J.Fleagle,C.Gilbert 2011-2012 [6] ] - [J.Roach 2008 [7] ] - [V. McMains - 2011 [8] ] - [2009 [9] & [10] ] [Retrieved 2012-01-01]
  38. ^ Kordos L, Begun D R (2001). "Primates from Rudabánya: allocation of specimens to individuals, sex and age categories". J. Hum. Evol. 40 (1): 17–39. DOI:10.1006/jhev.2000.0437. PMID 11139358. 
  39. ^ David W. Cameron (2004). Hominid adaptations and extinctions. UNSW Press. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-86840-716-6. http://books.google.com/books?id=fnqzb4_UVfkC&pg=PA76. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  40. ^ David Rains Wallace (13 September 2005). Beasts of Eden: Walking Whales, Dawn Horses, and Other Enigmas of Mammal Evolution. University of California Press. pp. 240–. ISBN 978-0-520-24684-3. http://books.google.com/books?id=YoyQQEOKGVQC&pg=PA240. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  41. ^ Zalmout, I.S.; Sanders, W.J.; MacLatchy, L.M.; Gunnell, G.F.; Al-Mufarreh, Y.A.; Ali, M.A.; Nasser, A.-A.H.; Al-Masari, A.M. et al. (2010). "New Oligocene primate from Saudi Arabia and the divergence of apes and Old World Monkeys". Nature 466 (7304): 360–364. DOI:10.1038/nature09094. PMID 20631798. 
  42. ^ Srivastava (2009). Morphology Of The Primates And Human Evolution. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.. p. 87. ISBN 978-81-203-3656-8. http://books.google.com/books?id=kCerOsM8XMwC&pg=PA87. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  43. ^ Strait DS, Grine FE, Moniz MA (1997). "A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny". J. Hum. Evol. 32 (1): 17–82. DOI:10.1006/jhev.1996.0097. PMID 9034954. 
  44. ^ a b Bill Bryson (2004). "28. The Mysterious Biped". A Short History of Nearly Everything. Random House, Inc.. pp. 522–543. ISBN 978-0-385-66004-4. http://books.google.com/books?id=RKHLD9qNs64C. 
  45. ^ Peter Ungar & Mark F. Teaford (2002). Human Diet: Its Origin and Evolution. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-89789-736-5. 
  46. ^ Bogin, Barry (1997). "The evolution of human nutrition". In Romanucci-Ross, Lola; Moerman, Daniel E.; & Tancredi, Laurence R.. The Anthropology of Medicine: From Culture to Method (3 ed.). South Hadley MA: Bergen and Garvey. pp. 96–142. ISBN 978-0-89789-516-3. http://web.archive.org/web/20031203003838/http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/ANTAO1/Projects/Bogin.html. 
  47. ^ Barnicot NA (April/June 2005). "Human nutrition: evolutionary perspectives". Integr Physiol Behav Sci 40 (2): 114–17. DOI:10.1007/BF02734246. PMID 17393680. 
  48. ^ Leonard WR, Snodgrass JJ, Robertson ML (2007). "Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism". Annu Rev Nutr. 27: 311–27. 
  49. ^ Wood, B. & Collard, M. (1999) The changing face of Genus Homo. Evol. Anth. 8(6) 195-207
  50. ^ "Toothy Tree-Swinger May Be Earliest Human". News.discovery.com. 2010-05-21. http://news.discovery.com/human/human-ancestor-tree-swinger.html. Retrieved 2011-05-14. 
  51. ^ Wood B (1999). "'Homo rudolfensis' Alexeev, 1986-fact or phantom?". J. Hum. Evol. 36 (1): 115–8. DOI:10.1006/jhev.1998.0246. PMID 9924136. 
  52. ^ Gabounia L. de Lumley M. Vekua A. Lordkipanidze D. de Lumley H. (2002). "Discovery of a new hominid at Dmanisi (Transcaucasia, Georgia)". Comptes Rendus Palevol 1 (4): 243–53. DOI:10.1016/S1631-0683(02)00032-5. 
  53. ^ Lordkipanidze D, Vekua A, Ferring R, et al. (2006). "A fourth hominin skull from Dmanisi, Georgia". The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology 288 (11): 1146–57. DOI:10.1002/ar.a.20379. PMID 17031841. 
  54. ^ Turner W (1895). "On M. Dubois' Description of Remains recently found in Java, named by him Pithecanthropus erectus: With Remarks on so-called Transitional Forms between Apes and Man". Journal of anatomy and physiology 29 (Pt 3): 424–45. PMC 1328414. PMID 17232143. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1328414. 
  55. ^ Spoor F, Wood B, Zonneveld F (1994). "Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal locomotion". Nature 369 (6482): 645–8. DOI:10.1038/369645a0. PMID 8208290. 
  56. ^ Bermúdez de Castro JM, Arsuaga JL, Carbonell E, Rosas A, Martínez I, Mosquera M (1997). "A hominid from the lower Pleistocene of Atapuerca, Spain: possible ancestor to Neandertals and modern humans". Science 276 (5317): 1392–5. DOI:10.1126/science.276.5317.1392. PMID 9162001. 
  57. ^ Carbonell, Eudald; José M. Bermúdez de Castro et al. (2008-03-27). "The first hominin of Europe". Nature 452 (7186): 465–469. DOI:10.1038/nature06815. PMID 18368116. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7186/full/nature06815.html. Retrieved 2008-03-26. 
  58. ^ Manzi G, Mallegni F, Ascenzi A (2001). "A cranium for the earliest Europeans: Phylogenetic position of the hominid from Ceprano, Italy". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (17): 10011–6. DOI:10.1073/pnas.151259998. PMC 55569. PMID 11504953. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=55569. 
  59. ^ Czarnetzki, A; Jakob, T; Pusch, CM (2003). "Palaeopathological and variant conditions of the Homo heidelbergensis type specimen (Mauer, Germany)". Journal of Human Evolution 44 (4): 479–95. DOI:10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00029-0. PMID 12727464. 
  60. ^ "Scientists discover hominid cranium in Ethiopia" (Press release). Indiana University. March 27, 2006. http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/3142.html. Retrieved 2006-11-26. 
  61. ^ Harvati K (2003). "The Neanderthal taxonomic position: models of intra- and inter-specific craniofacial variation". J. Hum. Evol. 44 (1): 107–32. DOI:10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00208-7. PMID 12604307. 
  62. ^ Herrera, K. J.; Somarelli, J. A.; Lowery, R. K.; Herrera, R. J. (2009). "To what extent did Neanderthals and modern humans interact?". Biological Reviews 84 (2): 245–257. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00071.x. PMID 19391204.  edit
  63. ^ Krings M, Stone A, Schmitz RW, Krainitzki H, Stoneking M, Pääbo S (1997). "Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans". Cell 90 (1): 19–30. DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80310-4. PMID 9230299. 
  64. ^ Green RE, et al. (2008). "A complete Neandertal mitochondrial genome sequence determined by high-throughput sequencing". Cell 134 (3): 416–426. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021. PMC 2602844. PMID 18692465. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2602844. 
  65. ^ Serre D, Langaney A, Chech M, et al. (2004). "No Evidence of Neandertal mtDNA Contribution to Early Modern Humans". PLoS Biol. 2 (3): E57. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057. PMC 368159. PMID 15024415. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=368159. 
  66. ^ a b Jennifer Viegas (2010-05-06). "Neanderthals, humans interbred, DNA proves". Discovery News. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://news.discovery.com/human/neanderthal-human-interbreed-dna.html. Retrieved 2010-08-17. 
  67. ^ Gutiérrez G, Sánchez D, Marín A (2002). "A reanalysis of the ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences recovered from Neandertal bones". Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (8): 1359–66. PMID 12140248. 
  68. ^ Hebsgaard MB, Wiuf C, Gilbert MT, Glenner H, Willerslev E (2007). "Evaluating Neanderthal genetics and phylogeny". J. Mol. Evol. 64 (1): 50–60. DOI:10.1007/s00239-006-0017-y. PMID 17146600. 
  69. ^ Diamond, Jared (1992). The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-098403-8. 
  70. ^ How Neanderthals met a grisly fate: devoured by humans. The Observer. May 17, 2009
  71. ^ "DNA identifies new ancient human dubbed 'X-woman'". BBC News. March 25, 2010
  72. ^ a b Sample, Ian (March 24, 2010). "New species of human ancestor found in Siberia". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/mar/24/new-human-species-siberia. 
  73. ^ Krause, Johannes; Fu, Qiaomei; Good, Jeffrey M.; Viola, Bence; Shunkov, Michael V.; Derevianko, Anatoli P. & Pääbo, Svante (2010). "The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia". Nature 464 (7290): 894–897. DOI:10.1038/nature08976. PMID 20336068. 
  74. ^ Katsnelson, Alla (March 24, 2010). "New hominin found via mtDNA". The Scientist. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57254/#ixzz0j820ioz1. 
  75. ^ "Denisova Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania", The American Journal of Human Genetics, DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.09.005, PMC 3188841, PMID 21944045, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929711003958 
  76. ^ Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, et al. (2004). "A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia". Nature 431 (7012): 1055–61. DOI:10.1038/nature02999. PMID 15514638. 
  77. ^ Argue D, Donlon D, Groves C, Wright R (2006). "Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?". J. Hum. Evol. 51 (4): 360–74. DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.013. PMID 16919706. 
  78. ^ a b Martin RD, Maclarnon AM, Phillips JL, Dobyns WB (2006). "Flores hominid: new species or microcephalic dwarf?". The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology 288 (11): 1123–45. DOI:10.1002/ar.a.20389. PMID 17031806. 
  79. ^ Supervolcanoes, BBC2, 3 February 2000
  80. ^ Stanley H. Ambrose (1998). "Late Pleistocene human population bottlenecks, volcanic winter, and differentiation of modern humans". Journal of Human Evolution 34 (6): 623–651. DOI:10.1006/jhev.1998.0219. PMID 9650103. 
  81. ^ Ambrose, Stanley H. (2005). "Volcanic Winter, and Differentiation of Modern Humans". Bradshaw Foundation. http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/evolution/. Retrieved 2006-04-08. 
  82. ^ Gibbons, Ann (1998). "Solving the Brain's Energy Crisis". Science 280 (5368): 1345–47. DOI:10.1126/science.280.5368.1345. PMID 9634409. 
  83. ^ F. Howell; François Bourlière (30 November 2007). African Ecology and Human Evolution. Transaction Publishers. p. 398. ISBN 978-0-202-36136-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=-kOvkb-xbU8C&pg=PA398. Retrieved 6 November 2011. 
  84. ^ a b Freeman, Scott; Jon C. Herron. Evolutionary Analysis (4th ed.)., Pearson Education, Inc. (2007). ISBN 978-0-13-227584-2 pp. 786-788
  85. ^ a b Plummer T (2004). "Flaked stones and old bones: Biological and cultural evolution at the dawn of technology". Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl 39: 118–64. DOI:10.1002/ajpa.20157. PMID 15605391. 
  86. ^ Ambrose SH (2001). "Paleolithic technology and human evolution". Science 291 (5509): 1748–53. DOI:10.1126/science.1059487. PMID 11249821. 
  87. ^ Mcbrearty S, Brooks AS (2000). "The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior". J. Hum. Evol. 39 (5): 453–563. DOI:10.1006/jhev.2000.0435. PMID 11102266. 
  88. ^ Behar et al. 2008, Gonder et al. 2007, Reed and Tishkoff
  89. ^ "Modern Humans Came Out of Africa, "Definitive" Study Says". News.nationalgeographic.com. 2010-10-28. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/070718-african-origin.html. Retrieved 2011-05-14. 
  90. ^ Stringer CB, Andrews P (March 1988). "Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans". Science 239 (4845): 1263–8. DOI:10.1126/science.3125610. PMID 3125610. 
  91. ^ Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC (1987). "Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution". Nature 325 (6099): 31–6. DOI:10.1038/325031a0. PMID 3025745. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://artsci.wustl.edu/~landc/html/cann/. 
  92. ^ a b Searching for traces of the Southern Dispersal, by Dr. Marta Mirazón Lahr, et al.
  93. ^ Macaulay, V.; Hill, C; Achilli, A; Rengo, C; Clarke, D; Meehan, W; Blackburn, J; Semino, O et al. (2005). "Single, Rapid Coastal Settlement of Asia Revealed by Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes". Science 308 (5724): 1034–6. DOI:10.1126/science.1109792. PMID 15890885. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/308/5724/1034. 
  94. ^ Gill, Victoria (May 1, 2009). "Africa's genetic secrets unlocked". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8027269.stm. Retrieved June 8, 2011.  the results were published in the online edition of the journal Science.
  95. ^ "The new batch - 150,000 years ago". BBC - Science & Nature - The evolution of man.
  96. ^ "When humans faced extinction". BBC. 2003-06-09. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2975862.stm. Retrieved 2007-01-05. 
  97. ^ Figure 1. Phylogeny of Primate Lice from Morphological and Molecular Data, in Reed DL, Smith VS, Hammond SL, Rogers AR, Clayton DH PLoS (2004). "Genetic Analysis of Lice Supports Direct Contact between Modern and Archaic Humans". PLoS Biol 2 (11): e340. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020340. PMC 521174. PMID 15502871. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=slideshow&type=figure&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020340&id=15540. 
  98. ^ Wolpoff, MH; Hawks J, Caspari R (2000). "Multiregional, not multiple origins". Am J Phys Anthropol 112 (1): 129–36. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200005)112:1<129::AID-AJPA11>3.0.CO;2-K. PMID 10766948. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/71008905/abstract. 
  99. ^ Wolpoff, MH; JN Spuhler, FH Smith, J Radovcic, G Pope, DW Frayer, R Eckhardt, G Clark (1988). "Modern Human Origins". Science 241 (4867): 772–4. DOI:10.1126/science.3136545. PMID 3136545. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pdf_extract/241/4867/772. 
  100. ^ Leakey, Richard (1994). The Origin of Humankind. Science Masters Series. New York, NY: Basic Books. pp. 87–89. ISBN 978-0-465-05313-1. 
  101. ^ Jorde LB, Bamshad M, Rogers AR (February 1998). "Using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers to reconstruct human evolution". BioEssays 20 (2): 126–36. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199802)20:2<126::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-R. PMID 9631658. 
  102. ^ Wall, J. D.; Lohmueller, K. E.; Plagnol, V. (2009). "Detecting Ancient Admixture and Estimating Demographic Parameters in Multiple Human Populations". Molecular Biology and Evolution 26 (8): 1823–7. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msp096. PMC 2734152. PMID 19420049. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2734152. 
  103. ^ Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW, et al. (May 2010). "A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome". Science 328 (5979): 710–22. DOI:10.1126/science.1188021. PMID 20448178. 
  104. ^ ^ Reich D, Green RE, Kircher M, et al. (December 2010). "Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia". Nature 468 (7327): 1053–60. doi:10.1038/nature09710. PMID 21179161
  105. ^ Reich D, Patterson N, Kircher M, et al. (October 2011). "Denisova admixture and the first modern human dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89 (4): 516–28. DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.09.005. PMC 3188841. PMID 21944045. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3188841. 
  106. ^ Medical Research Council (UK) (November 21, 2009). "Brain Disease 'Resistance Gene' evolves in Papua New Guinea community; could offer insights Into CJD". Science Daily (online) (Science News). Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091120091959.htm. Retrieved 2009-11-22. 
  107. ^ Mead, S.; Whitfield, J.; Poulter, M.; Shah, P.; Uphill, J.; Campbell, T.; Al-Dujaily, H.; Hummerich, H. et al. (2009). "A Novel Protective Prion Protein Variant that Colocalizes with Kuru Exposure.". The New England Journal of Medicine 361 (21): 2056–2065. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0809716. PMID 19923577.  edit
  108. ^ Byars, S. G.; Ewbank, D.; Govindaraju, D. R.; Stearns, S. C. (2009). "Natural selection in a contemporary human population". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (suppl_1): 1787–1792. Bibcode 2010PNAS..107.1787B. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0906199106. PMC 2868295. PMID 19858476. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2868295.  edit
  109. ^ Cochran G & Harpending H. 2009. The 10,000 Year Explosion. Basic Books N.Y.

  Further reading

  External links



todas las traducciones de Human_evolution

Contenido de sensagent

  • definiciones
  • sinónimos
  • antónimos
  • enciclopedia

  • definition
  • synonym

   Publicidad ▼

Investigaciones anteriores en el diccionario :

1947 visitantes en línea

computado en 0,063s

   Publicidad ▼